Many persons believe that the condemnable system and its establishments are flawed. These reviews have been brought on by the ineffectualness of prisons to reform persons. the awkwardness of the system to cut down offense rates. the deficiency of focal point on victims of offenses. every bit good as the racialist. classist and male chauvinist patterns bing in these establishments. Therefore. we can inquire ourselves if the riddance of the current penal system and the execution of options would better let resoluteness of social struggle? The undermentioned paper will explicate why militant and bookmans have rejected trust upon the current penal system and it’s constructions to set forth options that they find will be more successful and less inhibitory.
The first portion of this paper will concentrate on cardinal statements that emancipationists have advanced for the abolishment of prison. The 2nd portion will concentrate on statements advanced by emancipationist for entire penal and carceral abolitionism. The last portion will concentrate on the schemes and options that emancipationists have mobilized in their chase of prison. penal and carceral abolishment. The chief plants used to back up these statements will be of Davis. Mathieson. Beauchesne. Kappeler. Dyches. Guanipa. Elliot. Morris. Montur-Angus and Beck. To get down. militant and bookmans have advanced in reasoning for the abolishment of prisons with three cardinal statements: First. prisons fail at general bar of offenses. one of the chief objectives the establishment has set for itself ; Second. this establishment has failed at rehabilitating those who have been incarcerated ; Third. this establishment causes more harm than good with a battalion of collateral
effects. The plants of Mathieson. Richie. Clear. Beauchesne and Kappeler will be used in this subdivision to exemplify the above statements. First. general bar.
The end of general bar is to discourage others from perpetrating condemnable Acts of the Apostless by doing an illustration of those who have. Punishment will hence be used a message from the province to the general population. The province intends to do clear that offense does non pay. that it is immoral and that persons should acquire in the wont of avoiding certain Acts of the Apostless. ( Mathiesen. 2008. p. 65 ) This message from the province is invocated to the general population through a message bearer: the media. However “ The media chooses and nowadayss offense jobs for public ingestion. The choice of offense jobs is frequently limited to the most eccentric or ghastly act a journalist or research worker can bring out. ” ( Kappeler. 2000. p. 5 ) Because of this. the general population does non have the state’s message in respects to common offenses such as larceny. It is hence hard to forestall these offenses in society since the message about their turning away has non been transmitted to the general population.
An extra issue with general bar is message complexness lost through media filtration. “ Filtration means that the inside informations of statute law and sentencing pattern. the picks between countenances which are close to each other and which constitute the mundane modus operandi of condemnable policy. are consistently if non wholly left out. ” ( Mathiesen. 2008. p. 72 ) In order to discourage persons from perpetrating offenses. penalty must be expected. The province therefore wants to direct the message that if you commit offense “x” you will have punishment “y” . However. most people are incognizant of the sentences that will be received for perpetrating offenses. “ In this respect. research illustrates that the general public tends to undervalue the badness of countenances by and large imposed. This is non surprising given that members of the populace are frequently incognizant of the particulars of condemning policies. ” ( Wright. 2010. p. 3 ) The hard transmittal of the state’s message is apparent here.
The 3rd job with disincentive consist of a moral inquiry: “ What is the moral footing for penalizing person. possibly difficult. in order to forestall wholly different people from perpetrating tantamount Acts of the Apostless. when those we punish to a big extent are hapless and extremely stigmatized people in demand of aid instead than penalty? ” ( Mathiesen. 2008. p. 7 ) In criminological theories. we saw how police activity is mostly geared towards minor seeable offenses committed by persons from the lower stratums of society as oppose to “white collar crimes” committed by those of higher stratums ( Dube . CRM 3701. 2011 ) . Abolitionists argue that by badly penalizing some of the hapless in order to discourage society from perpetrating offenses ; we are merely farther lending to the inequalities in today’s society. A 2nd cardinal statement advanced for the abolishment of prisons is the failure to rehabilitate with imprisonment.
Rehabilitation is supposed to allow the person to be restored to a observant citizen. lending to society. However. emancipationists argue that prisons do non allow this. First. schooling and work within prisons is supposed to let persons to go productive citizens in society. However. “In many prisons. particularly the old 1s. the work which is offered is to a big extent meaningless ( puting advertisement stuff in envelopes. turn uping tobacco packages ) . or merely non-existent” . ( Mathiesen. 2008. p. 34 ) . This work experience is hence without benefit to the captive upon his release. In add-on. security poses obstructions to schooling plans in prisons. “The transportation of captives between prisons can non take topographic point irrespective of the prisoner’s school plan. the transportation from one cell block to another in the prison may connote that the plan is discontinued. ” ( Mathiesen. 2008. p. 36 ) As a consequence. rehabilitation through these plans is hard. Furthermore. emancipationists argue that the prison environment does non prefer rehabilitation.
Mathiesen explains that “prisons are frequently overcrowded. creaky. and more or less unsafe topographic points to those who inhabit them. [ … ] This is the mundane life of the prison – really far from any ‘treatment situation’” . ( Mathiesen. 2008. p. 47 ) In contrast. the Rat Park survey conducted as Simon Fraser University in 1994 showed the importance of environment in rehabilitation. In this survey. two groups of rats addicted to morphine were placed in separate coops. One group was placed in single coops with a H2O dispenser and entree to a morphine solution. The other group was placed in the rat park coop. filled with other rats ( both sexes ) . constructions. playthings. etc. and equal entree to the morphine solution. It was stated that the rats in the single coops consumed 16 times more morphine so the 1s in Rat Park. Therefore. bettering the rat’s environment helped them lose their dependance. ( Beauchesne. 2004. p. 122 ) By the same item. alternate environment to prison would let better rehabilitation. as isolation and deficiency of recreational activities tend to augment individual’s exposure. Last. emancipationists argue that the strivings of imprisonment brand rehabilitation hard.
“The basic want of autonomy itself. the want of goods and services. the want of heterosexual dealingss. the want of liberty. and the want of security in relation to other inmates. are so painful that they create a demand for defence. ” ( Mathiesen. 2008. p. 49 ) Because of this. inmates will be given to mistrust healer. intervention staff and psychologist in prison. The fact that they feel rejected by society creates ill will towards the prison system and it’s agents. The “us” versus “them” dynamic created between inmates and prison staff will therefore do any intervention or rehabilitation attempts hard. ( Pascal. CRM 3715. 2012 )
The 3rd cardinal statement utilized by emancipationist is that of collateral effects. Collateral effects consist of the impacts of imprisonment on household. communities. etc. One of the chief collateral effects caused by imprisonment is the impact on kids. Captivity of a parent can take to the stigmatisation of their kid. to them being put in Foster attention. to a diminished bond between the kid and their parent and to a lower quality of life. They besides will go exploited and if placed in a surrogate place. the Foster parents will hold small motive to keep the child’s relationship with their incarcerated parent. ( Richie. 2002. p. 142 ) Therefore. the captivity of the parent is harmful for the child’s development. “ Frequent alterations in life fortunes basically deny kids the necessary stableness. security and support to develop stable relationships. self-pride. personal liberty and resiliency. ” ( Robertson. 2012. p. 41 )
Another collateral effect is the impact of captivity on adult females as health professionals. “ The already bowed down function of caretaker in low-income households is farther complicated by the changeless menace adult females face of possible apprehension and detainment of a household member. helter-skelter tests. long prison sentences. the expensive visits and phone calls [ … ] ” . ( Richie. 2002. p. 146 ) Captivity makes it hard for adult females to supply a stable and healthy environment for their kids. “ Families that lack big male function members are known. on norm. to confront economic emphasiss and supply reduced degrees of kid supervising. ” ( Clear. 2002. p. 188 )
Last. the misgiving of abolitionist provinces the impact on societal control as another collateral effect. The negative relation one might hold with the prison system can take to negative positions of societal control agents. “ When they see their ex-convict household members caught up in a rhythm that keeps them idle. drug dependent. and at the border of recidivism. they blame the system for doing things worse” ( Clear. 2002: p. 192 ) . Consequently. these populations will be less likely to seek assistance from social-control should they of all time be victimized. “An experience such as this can so take to possible antipathy towards other figures of authorization such as instructors and prison officers. ” ( Dyches. 2009. p. 73 ) This first subdivision of this paper has focused on how imprisonment is non an efficient manner of reacting to the evildoing of social norms. The ineffectualness of relaying the state’s message to the population has caused disincentive to be an unmet end of the system. Furthermore. prisons have failed to rehabilitate persons due to their unconstructive environment. Last. prisons seem to do more negative effects so good. doing it a questionable establishment.
The following subdivision will concentrate on how abolitionist have now gone beyond prison abolishment to besides see penal and carceral abolitionism as these systems are thought to be sexist classist and racialist. farther intrenching social unfairnesss. The undermentioned three statements will show this stance: First. the penal system reproduces and reinforces patriarchal domination ; secondly. economical involvement gear the penal system alternatively of those of rehabilitation and reform and thirdly. the penal system is an extension of colonialism and bondage. The plants of Davis. Guanipa. Horii. and Beauchesne will be drawn upon during this subdivision.
To get down. gendering penalty. Many bookmans and captives have advanced that prison patterns and penalty in respects to adult females are intensely gendered in their character. farther reenforcing patriarchal domination. ( Davis. 2003. p. 61 ) Although this differential intervention based on sex would otherwise be considered unacceptable. it is tolerated towards incarcerated adult females. The manner the penal system positions incarcerated adult females demonstrates these gendered patterns. These adult females are seen as unnatural and neglecting to presume their gender function. In effect. their rehabilitation will mostly concentrate on learning proper female manners and will dwell of “assimilating right womanly behaviors-that is. by going experts in domesticity-especially cookery. cleansing. and sewing” ( Davis. 2003. p. 64 ) . Therefore. penal patterns reinforce gender outlooks of adult females. For illustration. Gayle Horii recounts how during her captivity. adult females. in contrast to work forces did non hold entree to hot H2O at first. The logic was that adult females would still clean themselves with stop deading cold H2O regardless. ( Horii. 1994. p. 16 )
Another manner the penal system enforces the patriarchal domination is by routinizing sexual maltreatment with day-to-day prison patterns. The province condones sexual force against adult females by integrating it in patterns such as the pit and strip hunt. ( Davis. 2003. p. 81 ) This maltreatment victimizes adult females and farther entrenches patriarchal domination by rendering them helpless to male prison staff: “The prison environment that this maltreatment occurs in is one where the adult female is wholly powerless. There is no existent answerability in prisons. It is a closed hypermale military environment demanding a slavish entry to hierarchy and authorization. ” ( George. p. 4 )
An extra manner which the penal system reinforces patriarchal laterality is through the credence of force against adult females by neglecting to acknowledge that the strivings of captivity often lead to self-harm. The figure of adult females self-destructions in prison compared to those in society is drastically higher. The suicide rate from 1988-1991 for incarcerated adult females was of 869 to 2609 for 100 000 adult females in contrast 3-8 adult females in Canadian society. ( Horii. 1994. p. 12 ) Furthermore. the penal system releasing duty for carceral conditions taking to suicide shows its tolerance for force against adult females. Horii explains how during an enquiry into a fellow inmates suicide. the medical examiner said that the prison was non at mistake in her decease and was to be extremely praised. even though the conditions mostly played a function in her taking her life. ( Horii. 1994. p. 11 )
The Ashley Smith instance is an illustration of the strivings of imprisonment taking to suicide. This instance was briefly discussed with guest lector Meghan Daniel. a attorney in civil judicial proceeding involved with the instance. She explained how the household was prosecuting the province in respects to this instance as miss intervention from prison staff led and played into to Ashley Smith’s self-destruction. A 2nd statement advanced by emancipationist for penal system abolishment is that of the prison industrial composite. The thought is that the penal system is non concentrating on rehabilitation and controling offense. but instead it is concentrating on economic and capitalist involvement.
Abolitionists argue that through the prison industrial composite. captives have been turned into trade goods. Guanipa. a past inmate. explains how prison labour is said to be helping inmates in rehabilitation and reform by supplying valid experience for the work force. However. the work completed in prison provides no marketable accomplishments to inmates. Alternatively this signifier of employment allows companies to use an person for multiple old ages without typical cost associated to employees ( benefit wage. societal insurance. minimal pay. etc ) . ( Guanipa. 2011. p. ) Therefore. the growing of prison populations have become sought by industries in order to allow their long term growing with this signifier of free labour. ( Davis. 2003. p. 94 )
Furthermore. emancipationists argue that penal enlargement and policy are driven by capitalist involvement. They explain how with prison denationalization “ federal. province. and county authoritiess pay private companies a fee for each inmate. which means that private companies have a interest in retaining captives every bit long as possible. and in maintaining their installations filled” ( Davis. 2003. p. 95 ) . Corporations. such as CCA ( Correctional Corporation of America ) . will hence develop schemes to maintain inmates locked up longer. For illustration. in these prisons. “inmates may acquire their sentences reduced for “good behaviour. ” but for any misdemeanor. they get 30 yearss added [ … ]
Harmonizing to a survey of New Mexico prisons. it was found that CCA inmates lost “good behaviour time” at a rate eight times higher than those in province prisons” . ( Pelaez. 2008 ) This denationalization theoretical account has expanded from the United States into other states. going their primary manner of pull offing penalty. ( Davis. 2003. p. 97 ) Another manner economical involvements are demonstrated in captivity is with the addition of corporations selling their goods to prisons. “Among many concerns that advertise in the xanthous pages on the corrections. com web site are Archer Daniel Midlands. Nestle Food Service. Ace Hardware. Polaroid. Hewlet- Packard. Rj Reynolds [ etc ] ( Davis. 2003. p. 99 ) As a effect. even non privatized prisons have big corporations puting in them.
Pamela O’Connell. explained how for the consumer electronic companies. prison population presented a moneymaking and interesting market. as goods for captives with extra security characteristics are sought after by the penal system. as captives frequently turns these goods into arms. ( O’Connell. 2001. p. 1 ) A 3rd cardinal statement advanced by emancipationist for penal system abolishment is that the penal system and its setups continue the domination and bondage patterns towards certain targeted groups. done in the past with colonialism and bondage. Abolitionists argue that those of colour are more likely to be targeted and criminalized by the penal system. “Police sections in major urban countries have admitted the being of formal processs designed to maximise the Numberss of African-Americans and Latinos arrested- even in the absence of likely cause. ” ( Davis. 2003. p. 31 ) Prison populations show how racism is entrenched in this establishment. where dominated groups are more likely to stop up. For illustration. as seen in CRM 3701. Native Americans consist of 3 % of Canadian population. yet 25 % of Canadian carceral population. ( Dube . CRM 3701. 2012 )
Abolitionists besides explain that people of colour are more likely to be sentenced longer. Guest talker Vicky Chartrand explained “Aboriginal people are subjected to countenances at the deeper terminal of the condemnable justice” ( Chartrand. 2012 ) . Many progress that harsher sentences are frequently attributed to Acts of the Apostless more likely to be committed by these targeted persons. For illustration. harsher drug Torahs for cleft ( normally consumed by lower category black work forces ) in contrast to those for cocaine ( normally consumed by high category white work forces ) in the provinces clearly target hapless black work forces in order to maintain them imprisoned longer. ( Beauchesne. 2003. p. 144 )
Last. emancipationists argue that the penal system permits an extension of bondage. After bondage was abolished. the penal system began to incorporate bondage patterns in carceral penalty. For illustration tanning. concatenation packs. difficult labour. etc. for black inmates. This was a new manner to command black labour ( Davis. 2003. p. 31 ) . Nowadays. prison labour is the new signifier of bondage: “ We no longer import slaves from Africa [ … ] Now we manus down long sentences to seeable minority communities made up preponderantly of Blacks and Hispanics. and put them indoors federal prisons to work like slaves. ” ( Guanipa. 2011. p. 28-29 ) The work completed by captives is non meant to be good to their rehabilitation. it is at that place to gain corporation and license bondage. We have now seen why emancipationists seek the entire abolishment of the penal system.
We explored how the penal system reproduced and enforced gender inequalities that would otherwise be considered unacceptable in society. In bend. we saw how economic involvement cogwheel penalty and the enlargements of the carceral system and finished with how the penal system allowed an extension of colonialism and bondage by other agencies.
We will now research the schemes and options to the penal system mobilized by emancipationist every bit good as their booby traps. We will get down by seeing the Restorative Justice attack which focuses on victim demands. We will so see the Transformative Justice attack. which will take in history more so merely the event of incorrect making and will complete with Social Justice and Abolition Democracy. Finally. we will research abolishment democracy. which preaches social transmutation and a battalion of options. Plants such as Davis. Elliot. Sudburry. Morris. Montur-Angus and Piche & A ; Strimelle will be drawn on in order to exemplify the above statements.
Let us get down with Renewing Justice. The Law Commission of Canada describes Restorative Justice as “ a procedure for deciding offense and struggles that focuses on righting the injury to the victims. on keeping wrongdoers accountable for their actions and on prosecuting the community in a struggle declaration procedure. ” ( As cited by Elliot. 2011. p. 67 ) Therefore. in contrast to our current punitory system. Renewing Justice gears its focal point towards turn toing the demands of victims instead so the discourtesy and it’s penalty. This attack allows victims to mend and transform by presenting new inquiries after a “crime” is committed such as: “ How can mend occur for victims and wrongdoers? How might the community take a more active function in turn toing the issues of its members? How can communities heal from offense? ” ( Beck. 2010. p. 81 )
Different applications of Restorative Justice have been utilised such as Victim–Offender Dialogues. Family Group Conferences. Circles. and Truth Commissions. non merely after a offense is committed. but besides in other scenes to help conciliators. societal workers and human services suppliers in deciding error. ( Beck. 2010. p. 82 ) An illustration of Victim-Offender duologue would be the narrative of Elizabeth. a victim of an armed robbery who. following the event had bladder control issues. emphasis. anxiousness. insomnia and a battalion of other psychological. societal and physiological effects. Even after her wrongdoer was convicted. she did non happen alleviation from her traumatic experience. Elizabeth participated in a Victim-Offender duologue. which allowed her to happen peace with what happened. She was eventually able to experience that her experience was over and the incubuss and anxiousness dissipated. ( Elliot. 2011. p. 64 ) Although the renewing attack has afforded many victims peace of head. it is non without obstructions.
The Restorative Justice undertaking is one that is funded and put in topographic point by our current penal system. This has caused the Restorative Justice attack to change its aims and linguistic communication to fit that of the condemnable justness system. A retaliatory lens has hence been adopted. doing the Renewing Justice plan to set less focal point on victims and their demands. alternatively. following a punitory stance. ( Piche & A ; Strimelle. 2007. p. 40 ) Thus the plan is non evaluated on whether it meets the demands of victims and has become another signifier of penalty.
A 2nd alternate attack is that of Transformative Justice. Like Renewing Justice. it puts a focal point on reconstructing the injury caused to a victim while including the wrongdoer. the victim’s household and the community in the struggle declaration. However. this attack will travel farther so Restorative Justice by sing the broader image. One event can non specify the injury done. A expression into past events. societal causes. an every bit good as societal unfairnesss is necessary in order to analyze the incorrect done decently. The focal point is hence non merely set on victims and their demands. but why injury has been committed. ( Morris. 2000. p. 4-5 ) “Transformative Justice requires metabolism at all degrees of society. Victims become subsisters ; culprits become good neighbours ; powerful people learn to exert their authorization responsibly or go less powerful. Part of the procedure of transmutation. hence. entails instilling new values in the society. ” ( Daly. 2000. p. 83 )
An illustration of a Transformative Justice attack is Native American peacemaking. This attack consists of a religious procedure leting persons to reconstruct harmoniousness to the community. “Peacemaking focal points on the care of relationships. If people treat each other with respect and people accept their duty. things move toward a feeling of harmoniousness. and justness has truly been done. ” ( As cited by Medelowitz. 2008. p. 1 ) In this procedure. a big circle of persons in the community and those involved in the struggle. will seek to reconstruct the strivings and injury caused on the victim. all without villainizing the “wrong doer” . This procedure will “ bring peace through good feelings. non through fright. Peacemaking involves deep hearing. non supporting. reasoning. forcing” ( Montur-Angus. 1995. p. 256 )
A booby trap that this application of Transformative Justice faces is that of our current condemnable system. This dominant system rejects Aboriginal attacks to conflict declaration by non leting Aboriginal communities the proper resources or control to asseverate their ain “criminal” affairs. Therefore. the thought that there may be more so one manner to turn to social wrongs so the one preached my the dominant system is rejected. ( Montur-Angus. 1995. p. 251 ) Briefly. it is clear that the current condemnable justness system is an obstruction to Transformative Justice. Lastly. Social Justice and Abolition Democracy as an alternate attack.
Davis explains that if the penal system were to be abolished. a replacement would non lie in a individual option or prison like alternate. but a battalion of options to imprisonment that would turn to greater issues of racism. sexism. classism. etc. in society. These options would include “ demilitarization of schools. revival of instruction at all degrees. a wellness system that provides free physical and mental attention to all. and a justness system based on reparation and rapprochement instead so requital and retribution. ” ( Davis. 2003. p 107 ) Therefore. in order to let abolishment. criminology must be dedicated to the abolishment of inequalities of wealth and power. life opportunities or it will fall back into correctionalism. ( Taylor. Walton and Young. 1973. p. 289 ) An illustration of an application of this abolitionist attack would be the run to legalize drug usage. This run has led to many states. such as the Netherlands legalising certain drugs like marihuana.
Davis explains that this procedure of legalizing drug usage allows turn toing issues of racial overrepresentation the penal system all while accomplishing the end of decarceration as a big figure or people of colour who are incarcerated because of the drug Torahs are decriminalized with this procedure. ( Davis. 2003. p. 109 ) Beauchesne explains how the Dutch Drug policy attack was accompanied with the aim and end of helping those who have debatable utilizations of drugs by allowing entree to intervention plans. ( Beauchesne. 2006. p. 117 ) Rehab plans are presently dearly-won and unavailable to hapless persons. Consequently. doing them free of charge references issues of classism. However. this abolitionist attack is non without any booby traps. An of import booby trap is that of “preaching to the choir” .
Julia Sudbury explains that emancipationist will frequently discourse abolishment and it’s attacks to other “like minded” people. However. in order for attacks such as Social Justice and Abolition Democracy to be possible. abolitionist demand to make beyond their comfort zones and speak to those who might non needfully oppose prisons. ( Sudbury. 2009. p. 180 ) By discoursing with them. a mass motion can be created that will let to level the current penal system by switching popular sentiment of abolishment. To reason. this paper has demonstrated why militant and bookmans have rejected trust upon the current penal system and it’s constructions to set forth options that they find will be more successful and less inhibitory.
We have seen how abolitionist have sought for prison abolishment because of the deficiency of success for them to run into at that place ain ends. we have looked over entire penal abolishment and how it is preached due to the social unfairnesss that the penal system reinforces. such as sexism. classism and bondage. And to complete. we have seen an overview of three options: Renewing Justice. Transformative Justice and Social Justice and Abolition Democracy. We have explored different ways that these options are applied in society and the booby traps that they present. As a consequence. it is clear that we still have a long manner to travel for abolishment of the penal system and it’s constructions as many obstructions stand in the manner of this vision being possible. It has been made clear that in execution of options in the current penal system does non work. as their values. linguistic communication and ends are different.
Abolitionist research should happen a manner of implementing options and leveling the current penal system. without them both entwining as this causes options to regress to retributive patterns. An change of general perceptual experiences of offense would besides be needed in order for abolishment to be plumbable.
BEAUCHESNE. L. ( 2004 ) Les drogues: Les Couts Caches de la Prohibition. Montreal. Lanctot. 333 P.
CLEAR. T. ( 2002 ) The job with Addition by Substraction: The Prison-cime Relationship in Low Income Communities. New York: The New Press. pp. 181-193
DALY. E. ( 2000 ) . Transformative Justice. Charting a Way to Reconciliation. hypertext transfer protocol: // centre. theparentscircle. org/images/c7cc6db3dfbd429cb06ea0132d1b60db. pdf. 183p.
DAVIS. A. ( 2003 ) . Are Prisons Obsolete? . New York: Seven Stories Press. 128 P.
DUBE . R. ( 2012 ) . Theorie criminologique 2 ( CRM 3701 ) . University of Ottawa. Winter term 2012.
DYCHES. Richard ( 2009 ) “Prisoners’ Families: The Forgotten Victims” . the Journal of Prisoners on Prisons. 18 ( 1 & A ; 2 ) : 72-80.
ELLIOT. E. ( 2011 ) Renewing Justice: A Vision of the Good. in Security with Care: Renewing Justice and Healthy Societies. Halifax. Fernwood Press. pp 63-79.
GEORGE. A. Sexual Assault by the State. Essendon Community Legal Centre. Victoria. retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. aic. gov. au/en/publications/previous % 20series/proceedings/1-27/~/media/ publications/proceedings/20/george. pdf
GUANIPA. Y. ( 2011 ) . Commentary on Imprisonment. Prison Labour and Re-entry. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons. 20 ( 1 ) : p. 23-34.
HORII. G. ( 1994 ) . Disarm the Ill-famed Thing. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons. 5 ( 2 ) : 10-
KAPPERLER. V. ( 2000 ) The Mythology of Crime and Criminal Justice. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press. Inc. ( Chap. 1 )
MATHIESEN. T. ( 2006 ) Are Prisons Obsolete? . New York: Seven Stories Press. 128 P.
MENDALOWITZ. A. ( 2008 ) Renewing Justice: Intergrating Peacemaking in Modern America. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nyc. gov/html/oath/pdf/Mendelowitz. pdf. 14p.
MONTURE-ANGUS. P. ( 1995 ) Myths & A ; Revolution. Ideas on Traveling Forward in Aboriginal Communities. in Boom in my Soul: A Mohawk Woman Speaks. Halifax: Fernwood. pp. 249-264
MORRIS. R. ( 2000 ) What is Transformative Justice? . in Stories of Transformative Justice. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’Press. pp. 3-22.
O’CONNELL. P. ( May 11th. 2001 ) New Economy ; For consumer goods manufacturers. it is non so bad to be behind bars. New York times. retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nytimes. com/2001 /05/14/business/new-economy-for-consumer-goods-producers-it-is-not-so-bad-to-be-behind-bars. hypertext markup language
PASCAL. D. ( 2012 ) . Tortures et Societes ( CRM 3715 ) . University of Ottawa. Winter term 2012 )
PELAEZ. V. ( 2008 ) . The prison industry in the United States ; large concern or a new signifier of bondage? Global research. retrieved from: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. globalresearch. ca/the-prison-industry-in-the-united-states-big-business-or-a-new-form-of-slavery/8289
PICHE . J. & A ; STRIMELLE. V. ( 2007 ) Restoratve Justice Program Evaluation Frameworks: A Site of Pitfalls and Oppurtunities. International Journal of Restorative Justice. 3 ( 2 ) : 40-56
POLLOCK. S. ( 2008 ) Locked In. Locked Out: Imprisoning Womans in the Shrinking and Punitive Welfare State. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University.
RICHIE. B. ( 2002 ) “Families and Incarceration” . in Marc Mauer and Meda Chesney-Lind. Invisible Punishment: The collateral Consequences of Mass imprisonment. New York: The New imperativeness. pp. 136-149.
SUDBURY. J. ( 2009 ) Constructing a Movemenrt to Abolish Prisons: Lessons from the U. S. . Journal of Prisonners. 18 ( 1 & A ; 2 ) 177- 184
TAYLOR. I. . WALTON. P. YOUNG. . J. ( 1973 ) The New Criminology. London: Routledge & A ; Kegan Paul ( Chap. 9 ) .
WRIGHT. V. ( 2010 ) The sentencing undertaking. consulted October 6th 2012.